All the evidence

Jason (Archaix) delivers a sweeping, provocative reinterpretation of recorded human history as a sequence of repeated, relatively recent planetary catastrophes — “resets” — driven by recurring celestial actors (a Nemesis/dark-star object and a “Phoenix” destructive body) and by a brief, historic vapor‑canopy epoch. He frames his argument around cross‑checked ancient calendars, king lists, mythic traditions, archaeological anomalies, and a personal corpus of decades of research. Below is a concise, structured summary of his main claims, the chronology he constructs, the kinds of evidence he invokes, and the most surprising or contentious points.

Core thesis and methodology

• Human recorded history begins (for the purposes of Jason’s framework) with a verified calendrical anchor in 5239 BC — the Nemesis Cataclysm — after which multiple global or hemispheric systemic resets repeatedly resurface and bury civilizational layers.
• Jason emphasizes that he only uses “dated” records (king lists, stelae, traditional chronographies, calendrical systems) and cross‑verifies cycles numerically (days, shars, years) to show recurring periodicities. He claims independent data sets (e.g., a 600‑year “Nur” cycle and a 138‑year “Phoenix” cycle) intersect in ways that are statistically unlikely to be accidental.
• He reads myths and sacred texts (Genesis, Babylonian, Sumerian, Chinese, Hindu, American traditions) as chronographic registers of real cataclysms rather than purely symbolic or timeless tales.

Key periodicities and mechanisms

• Nur (Anuna) cycle: a 600‑year period based on 360‑day year reckoning (600 years = 216,000 days). Jason traces later yuga constructions to stacked Nur cycles.
• Phoenix cycle: a 138‑year periodic component, grouping into larger 552‑year cycles and producing characteristic red dust/rain, red mud, sun darkening and volcanic resurfacing.
• Nemesis X / dark satellite: a different periodicity (including a 60‑year and longer cycles) associated with deep‑plane (off‑ecliptic) bodies that enter the inner system unexpectedly.
• Vapor canopy / capture flood model: a relatively short (centuries‑long) atmospheric regime that collapsed catastrophically (he links this collapse to the birth/appearance of the Moon in human skies and to dramatic hydrological change).

Timeline of major events (Jason’s reconstruction — select highlights)

• 5239 BC — Nemesis Cataclysm: Jason takes this as the foundational reset that erases earlier strata and starts the surviving human chronological record.
• 4309 BC — First appearance of the Phoenix (red rains, “Adamu” buried in red earth): interpreted as the source of Genesis’s “Adam made from red earth” misunderstanding. Introduces a 138‑year periodicity.
• 4039 BC — Moon capture / “capture flood”: Jason says the Moon appears, shatters/glaciers fall, oceans grow; calendars shift from stellar to lunar/solar.
• 3895 BC — Adam & Eve reset (Genesis Year 1): a pole shift and world‑reshaping event; Jason treats Genesis as a reset chronicle (nakedness = infrastructure collapse).
• 3439 BC — Arrival/visibility of civilization builders (Enki/Enoch, Oannes/Vulcan:

, “dragon kings”): Jason links Sumerian, Phoenician, Chinese, and Genesis records to a roughly contemporaneous wave of culture/technology transfer and elite rulership.

• 2647 BC — Sun darkening; disappearance of some gods (start of “shock”/abandonment phase).
• 2239 BC — Typhon / Noah’s flood: collapse of vapor canopy, global inundation and thick red mud deposits; he regards this as the beginning of solar/héliolithic calendars and Babylonian omen astronomy.
• 1687 BC — Ogajian deluge: another Phoenix resurfacing with volcanic global effects (Jason has a multi‑video series devoted to this date).
• 1135 BC — Destruction tied to the Mediterranean “Dark Age” and alleged Atlantis loss (Jason contests Hancock’s older dates but accepts a Bronze Age catastrophe).
• 522 AD — Justinian darkness: Jason treats this as a unique year when both Phoenix and Nemesis phenomena coincided, triggering a major systemic reset and the start of medieval “Dark Ages.”
• 1212 AD, 1902 AD — Later Phoenix/Nemesis episodes with extensive eyewitness and environmental anomalies (1212: earthquakes, blood rain, mass vanishing narratives; 1902: worldwide red rain/mud, volcanoes, comets, and an appearance he reads as a modern Phoenix event).
• 2039–2040 (near future) — Jason suggests the next major conjunction/manifestation window is imminent and tied to numerological/pyramid chronologies.

Types of evidence used

• Cross‑cultural myth parallels (e.g., “Adamu” → Adam, Enki ↔ Enoch, dragon kings in China ↔ Sumerian seven kings).
• Ancient calendrical systems and king lists (Sumerian King List,:

Chinese annals, Babylonian chronologies).

• Archaeology: buried urban sites (Göbekli Tepe, Çatalhöyük), deeply buried North American artifacts and coal‑seam finds, and unusual stratigraphic deposits (red mud, carbonaceous fallout).
• Historic reportage of atmospheric anomalies (blood/red rains, darkened suns, comets/objects seen in sky) documented in older registers and newspapers (Jason repeatedly cites 1902).
• Megalithic architecture and the Great Pyramid as encoded chronometry (he links pyramid courses and measurements to epochal dates such as 21106 AD and to Exodus numbers like 2448 months).

Surprising and contentious claims

• Multiple recent global resurfacing events: Jason repeatedly asserts that the world has been “totally destroyed” on the order of a dozen to nearly twenty times since 5239 BC — far more frequent and recent than conventional deep‑time models allow.
• Moon capture and late appearance: he claims the Moon was captured and appeared within human memory (4039 BC), shattering and delivering ice/water — a claim that contradicts standard planetary formation.
• Vapor canopy theory restated: a centuries‑long canopy that fell in recorded history producing the “birth” of the sun in human calendars — controversial and outside mainstream atmospheric/astronomical science.
• Reinterpretation of Genesis and other myths as misread technical chronologies (Adamu ≠ a single Adam, but a descriptor for a buried population) — provocative for both religious and secular scholars.
• Systematic rejection of Young er Dryas impact hypothesis advocates (Hancock, Carlson) as misdating or misreading evidence; Jason accuses some popular authors of bibliographic fabrication and shilling.
• Allegations of widespread fraud or unreliability in dating methodologies (carbon dating inconsistencies) and suppressed archaeological reports.

Rhetoric, evidence quality, and points of debate

• Jason’s style mixes detailed calendrical numerology with archival citations and polemic; he claims cross‑verification but leans heavily on reinterpretation of mythic language and selective readings of early chronicles.
• Surprising alignments of different calendrical datasets (600‑year Nur vs. 138‑year Phoenix) are presented as improbable coincidences; skeptics will ask for reproducible datasets and peer‑reviewed cross‑checks.
• The most contentious physical claims (Moon capture, vapor canopy, recent global resurfacing multiple times) contradict geophysics, planetary science, and mainstream stratigraphy; they demand extraordinary evidence (high‑quality, multidisciplinary strata analysis, repeated independent dating, and astronomical modeling).
• Jason challenges conventional archaeologists and popular “alternative” theorists alike, accusing some of deliberate misdirection and others of naïve speculation.

Bottom line

Jason’s Archaix reconstruction is a consistent, internally cross‑referenced alternative chronology that compresses massive geological and civilizational upheavals into a series of repeatable cycles within the last ~7,000 years. It is rich in intertextual readings of myth and calendar math, and offers a tightly woven narrative that many will find intellectually provocative and rhetorically forceful. The most:

consequential claims — repeated recent global resets, late Moon capture, and a vapor canopy collapse — are decisive departures from mainstream science and therefore both the most intriguing and the most controversial. Readers interested in evaluating Jason’s thesis should focus on the primary datasets he invokes (king lists, sealed inscriptions, dated stelae, contemporaneous sky reports like 1902) and seek independent, physical stratigraphic and radiometric corroboration for the catastrophic events he places in the last several millennia.