Sign in Subscribe

Bitcoin Hardtalk 90-3

Bitcoin Hardtalk 90-3

Introduction: The Geopolitical Chessboard

Simon Dixon, in Episode 90 of Bitcoin Hard Talk, outlines a complex geopolitical analysis centered on what he terms the "Proof of Weapons Network" (PoWN). This framework is used to deconstruct three interconnected global events: the strategic use of the Jeffrey Epstein files, the multifaceted war in Syria, and the escalating crisis in Israel and Palestine. The core argument is that these seemingly disparate events are not random but are calculated power plays orchestrated by a stateless, powerful elite. This elite operates through factions within the PoWN to control global politics, finance, and military outcomes, with the ultimate goal of profit and control. The speaker aims to "follow the money" to reveal the true players and their motivations, connecting high-level geopolitical maneuvers to their real-world consequences and proposing a path for individuals to opt out of this system.

The unabridged transcript follows below
You can watch the original video here

The Central Framework: Understanding the "Proof of Weapons Network"

Before diving into specific events, the speaker establishes his primary analytical tool: the Proof of Weapons Network (PoWN). This is not a formal organization but a conceptual network of powerful entities that exert control over sovereign governments.

  • Core Controllers: At the apex of this network are colossal asset managers like BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. Through their vast shareholdings and board seats across nearly every major corporation, they effectively control both the financial-industrial complex and the technology-military-industrial complex.
  • Factions and Players: The PoWN is comprised of competing but ultimately aligned factions. The speaker identifies a "legacy financial-industrial complex" (often associated with traditional banking and business figures like Donald Trump) and a "technology-industrial complex" (represented by figures like Elon Musk). While these factions engage in power struggles, their actions ultimately serve the interests of the asset managers at the top.
  • Methods of Control: The network maintains its dominance over politicians and governments through a three-tiered strategy:
    1. Investing and Grooming: Identifying and funding promising politicians from early in their careers to ensure their loyalty.
    2. Buying Influence: The overt use of campaign finance, powerful lobbying groups, and media control to shape policy.
    3. Blackmail: The ultimate tool for control when the first two methods are insufficient. The Epstein operation is presented as a prime example of this third tier, a mechanism created to ensure the absolute compliance of powerful individuals.

The Epstein Files: A Strategic Power Play

The recent developments surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case are not viewed as a pursuit of justice but as a strategic weapon being wielded within the PoWN.

  • Elon Musk's Escalation and Trump's Contradictions: Elon Musk, representing the technology faction, has been relentlessly demanding the release of the Epstein client list on his platform, X. This directly contradicts Donald Trump's narrative that the files are a "Democrat hoax" and that the list doesn't exist. This public clash creates a significant problem for Trump, making him appear either dishonest or compromised, thereby weakening his credibility with his base.
  • Ghislaine Maxwell's Offer and Missing Evidence: The situation is further complicated by Ghislaine Maxwell's offer to testify before Congress and reveal the client list. Simultaneously, new evidence shows that nearly three minutes of crucial prison footage from around the time of Epstein's death were deleted, deepening suspicions of a cover-up that occurred under the Trump administration's watch.
  • Trump's Background: A System of Compromise: The speaker references a documentary suggesting Trump's entire career was built within a "cesspool" of organized crime and corrupt pay-to-play politics in New York and New Jersey. His alleged connections to mob figures like 'Fat Tony' Salerno and his son-in-law Jared Kushner's family history (including Charles Kushner's conviction for setting up a honey-trap blackmail scheme) are presented as evidence that Trump is not an outsider but a product of the very system of compromise he claims to oppose.
  • The True Game: Weakening Trump for Strategic Control: The speaker's central thesis is that Musk's campaign is a calculated power play. He argues that Musk and the PoWN elite know the full Epstein list will never be released because it implicates too many powerful figures across all factions, including the financiers and intelligence agencies that run the network. Therefore, Musk's demands are not about transparency. Instead, the goal is to strategically weaken Trump's MAGA base. By highlighting Trump's inconsistencies and potential compromise on an issue as visceral as child sexual abuse, Musk can erode Trump's power, making him a more dependent and predictable asset for the PoWN should he return to office. It's a move to ensure that even a "wild card" like Trump remains firmly under the network's control.

The Syrian Quagmire: A Multi-Factional Conflict

The sudden escalation in Syria, marked by an Israeli airstrike on Damascus, is analyzed as another complex maneuver within the larger geopolitical game. To understand it, one must first deconstruct the key factions on the ground.

  • Deconstructing the Players in Syria:
    • HTS (Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham): Backed by Turkey and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), representing their interests in a post-Assad Syria.
    • SDF (Syrian Democratic Forces) and the Kurds: Backed by the US, specifically the financial-industrial complex. They control Syria's valuable oil and wheat fields, providing a slush fund for American black operations.
    • The Druze and Israel: The Druze are a complex group, but a key militia faction is aligned with Israeli interests. Israel itself is presented as a tool of the US military-industrial complex.
    • Russia and UAE: Aligned through investments like the Tartus Port, representing BRICS-aligned interests in the region's normalization.
  • Israel's Opportunistic Strike and Netanyahu's Motives: The speaker posits that the recent Israeli strike was not part of a coordinated plan but an opportunistic move. A local conflict erupted between the Druze and the HTS. Seeing this chaos, Israel, under the guise of "defending the Druze," launched an attack on Damascus. The true goals were threefold: 1) to weaken HTS and its GCC/Turkey backers, 2) to seize more territory and gain leverage in the eventual negotiations over Syria's future, and 3) to provide a crucial distraction for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is facing immense domestic political pressure.
  • The Hegemonic Game: Military vs. Financial Interests: This conflict is a microcosm of the larger struggle within the PoWN. The US financial complex (backing the SDF) and the GCC want stability and normalization to facilitate capital inflows, investment, and rebuilding (e.g., AI data centers, nuclear energy deals with Iran). The US military-industrial complex (acting through Israel) profits from chaos, war, and destabilization. Netanyahu's actions serve the military faction, but this risks derailing the broader, more profitable normalization plan favored by the financial faction.

The Consequences: Israel's Internal Turmoil and the Gaza Genocide

The speaker connects these high-level plays to the grim realities unfolding in Israel and Palestine, arguing that the genocide in Gaza is a direct consequence of this power struggle.

  • Netanyahu's Collapsing Coalition: Netanyahu is fighting for his political survival. His governing coalition is on the verge of collapse after he moved to force ultra-Orthodox Jews, whose parties are essential to his majority, to be conscripted into the military. The Syrian strike serves as a "wag the dog" scenario to rally nationalist support and distract from his corruption trials and crumbling government.
  • International Condemnation and the Façade of Support: Israel's actions in Syria and its attacks on historic Christian churches in Palestine have drawn near-universal condemnation from Arab nations, the UN, and even public rebukes from US officials. This growing isolation is presented as a deliberate part of the PoWN's long-term plan: to strategically weaken Israel into a pariah state. Once Zionism is no longer a useful tool for profit, the network will pivot, allowing the financial complex to take over and profit from the region's "rebuilding."
  • Humanitarian Catastrophe in Gaza: The System's Brutal Reality: The speaker ends with a harrowing depiction of the situation in Gaza, which he describes as the tangible outcome of the PoWN's machinations. He details a deliberate campaign of starvation and famine, executed by Israel with US backing. Aid is systematically blocked, and what little gets through is controlled by proxies who create hyperinflation. He describes Palestinians being forced into "concentration camps" to receive food, only to be sniped or left empty-handed. This, he argues, is the true face of the system: a brutal, inhuman process that backs the US dollar with violence and is designed to crush any resistance.

The Speaker's Solution: Exiting the System Through Bitcoin

Faced with this overwhelmingly powerful and corrupt system, the speaker does not advocate for political protest in the traditional sense, but for a strategic economic exit.

  • Boycott the System's Pillars: The core of the solution is to remove one's economic energy from the institutions that enable the PoWN. This means boycotting the Federal Reserve (which props up the dollar through violence), the big banks, and the asset managers like BlackRock.
  • Embrace Bitcoin and Self-Custody: The primary tool for this exit is Bitcoin. By owning Bitcoin and holding it in self-custody (not on an exchange or in an ETF), individuals can store their wealth outside the traditional financial system, starving it of capital and power.
  • Build Independent Economic Power: Over time, the goal is to build enough economic power outside the system to become truly sovereign. This includes transacting locally, supporting local farmers, and eventually having enough wealth to make life decisions (like buying a home) without needing to borrow from the corrupt banking system. This economic power becomes the foundation for creating real, meaningful change, peacefully, by simply opting out.

Conclusion: A World at a Crossroads

The speaker concludes that we are living through a pivotal moment in history. The world is witnessing the overt power plays of a global network that uses war, blackmail, and economic devastation as tools for profit. The events in Syria, the Epstein saga, and the Gaza genocide are not isolated incidents but symptoms of a deeply corrupt system. While the picture is grim, individuals have a choice and a powerful tool at their disposal. By understanding the game and strategically removing their consent and capital from the system via Bitcoin, they can begin to build a parallel economy based on sovereignty and peace, ultimately creating a better future.

Unabridged transcript

Welcome back to Bitcoin Hard Talk episode 90, part three, where we're going to be discussing a proof of weapons network double game. We're going to be covering the Jeffrey Epstein files and what it means geopolitically, as well as the Syria war. By following the money, we'll see what it really means, who all the different players are, how it relates to you in the West, the different power plays that are happening, and the future of the region as I see it.

So let's start with the Epstein files. This was a strategic escalation by Elon Musk, a big player in the proof of weapons network representing the technology industrial complex. Trump, a politician that also is a business person, mainly aligns with the legacy financial industrial complex of the proof of weapons network. There is a power play and a power struggle. But both of those are controlled by the asset managers like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard because they have large share positions in all of these companies across all of these portfolios, as well as board seats and the most important voting shares.

So this week, let's cover what happened, and then I'll go through following the money. I'm also going to do a little bit of an AI summary because I released a new blog this week on the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Trump. Last week we did the AI summary of Trump and Epstein and Mossad. This week, I'm going to be doing the relationship between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. I did a blog on it where you can watch the full thing and a documentary by Ryan Dawson if you want to go deeper, but I'll also play the AI summary. Firstly, let's go through what happened this week, then we'll go through following the money, the AI summary, and then we'll go through Syria. So buckle up.

Elon Musk basically came out this week and said on X, "The government's," quote, "must have a list of rapists." Yes, I don't want to get banned on any of my channels. "Aka the Epstein client list in their possession. And they must release it right effing now." So, lots of colorful language as we escalated this. Remember last week the FBI said that basically the Epstein client list did not exist. Nothing to see here. FBI, Department of Justice, no client list, we don't need to release anything, despite all the contradictions. This enraged the Trump supporters, and even across America, Democrats and Republicans aligned around a shared vision that we don't want pedos in our country coming after our children for blackmail operations and committing crimes against humanity that are being used through sexual violence in America as well.

So, the convicted felon, which was the handler of Jeffrey Epstein, the daughter of Robert Maxwell, the Mossad super agent that engaged in the Iran-Contra affair and weaponizing Iran and funding ISIS and al-Qaeda for Western interests and creating those proxy groups and various other things, his daughter Ghislaine Maxwell, who was involved in the Bill Clinton blackmail to end the Oslo Accords and make sure there was no Palestinian state, as well as other operations. If you read the book by Whitney Webb, One Nation Under Blackmail, it goes through the funding of the White House and the Clinton administration. And then the Epstein house had that picture of Bill Clinton wearing Monica Lewinsky's dress and the painting, and various other things as well. Ghislaine Maxwell, who is in prison, who was convicted, basically also says that she is willing to speak in front of Congress about the Epstein files. So this creates a very uncertain situation for the proof of weapons network and all of the banksters and the financial industrial complex that are all settled. We know all the different parts of the victims and who they exposed in the banksters and the financiers of many things. So, it won't be released, but we seem to be getting this game.

Ghislaine Maxwell said that she is willing to testify before US Congress about the Epstein files. That was reported by the Daily Mail, part of the proof of weapons network-controlled Rupert Murdoch empires that consist of billionaires that are also aligned with Zionist ideology, that also control many shares in the proof of weapons network as well, at the top of the power structure. So media is able to be weaponized as needed. Maxwell said that she's willing to reveal Jeffrey Epstein's client list as well in the same article.

It was also released that the metadata from the Department of Justice raw Epstein prison footage reveals that despite what the Trump administration said, approximately 2 minutes and 53 seconds were removed from one of the two video files that were meant to be released, that was meant to be evidence that Jeffrey Epstein hung himself and there was no infiltration. So what we were told by AUSA T.J. Bundy, that it was 1 minute that was taken out, it was actually 2 minutes and 53 seconds according to the metadata. So there's more and more lies. The video was then spliced together from the two files, for which she gave some reason. In the documentary, I cover all these videos if you want to see that as well and you want to catch up on all this stuff. That's all on the blog that I'll be sharing in a bit. I'll give an AI summary so that you can catch up quickly if you don't want to do the whole thing. But this occurs just before the well-known missing minute, and so there are inconsistencies there. This is sending people that are investigating this stuff into absolute doubt and strategically weakening the Trump administration.

The Department of Justice has basically come out and said, "Right, we're going to fire Maureen Comey," who was basically the prosecutor in the Sean P. Diddy Combs case and the Ghislaine Maxwell case. And so they're throwing the prosecutor under the bus when it's already too late, and they become the fall person, I guess.

There was an article that came out that said Trump allegedly says that Jeffrey Epstein had a letter, and inside the letter, there was an outline of a naked woman for basically his 50th anniversary. That was according to the Wall Street Journal. Trump denies all these allegations, basically saying that this never happened. Quote, he said, "I never wrote a picture in my life." Very strange back and forth happening as well. Trump continued to call the Epstein files basically a Democrats' hoax, just like "Russia, Russia, Russia," and this was done by Obama. And then he even said it was done by Biden, and he tries to stop himself. So it's incredibly inconsistent despite everything. We covered all of this last week, so I'm just giving the updates on what happened. Blame Obama, blame Biden, say that the Epstein files don't exist, say that it was a hoax. But this one is sexual violence and victims, and this is a very serious one. You can't just have Russia come out on this one. So the Trump base is becoming really, really split.

And so what I wanted to do is a couple of things. I wanted to go into the AI summary of the blog that I created that looks into Trump's background and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein and various other networks. And then after that, we want to follow the money, connect it to what's going on with Musk, and do a little bit of projecting around what we think comes next and what this is really about for the proof of weapons network. And then we'll move over to Syria. So, what we're about to play, Azard's going to get it ready. This is an AI summary video, and it's from, if you go to simonixon.com, there's a blog post that's called "Is Trump Blackmailed by Epstein?" And there you can get the full documentary, the full blog post, and you can find all of the details and source files for anyone that wants to dig deeper into this stuff. So without further ado, Azard, do you want to play the AI summary for the Jeffrey Epstein and Trump AI summary?

[Start of AI Summary Video]

Welcome back to the deep dive. So today we're tackling a question that keeps coming up, especially with all the interest around the Epstein files still swirling. The question is, is Donald Trump being blackmailed by Epstein? Well, it's complicated. Our deep dive today is going to synthesize findings from Ryan Dawson's documentary, Trump's Zionist Ball and Chain. It offers a pretty specific perspective on the whole environment that shaped powerful figures like Trump.

Yeah. And what's really interesting is how this source material doesn't just look at things in isolation. It tries to weave it all together—systems history. It brings up this concept from Simon Dixon called the proof of weapons network. So our mission today really is to explore how this network is presented, how it supposedly operates, and it kind of prompts you, the listener, to think about what it means when power operates behind the scenes.

That's a great way to put it. So this proof of weapons network, can you unpack that a bit for everyone listening? How does Simon Dixon's framework say it actually works to keep governments subordinate?

Right. So, the framework basically lays out three main tools this network allegedly uses. First, you've got investing in politicians, grooming them early on. Second, there's buying influence: campaign finance, lobby groups, that kind of thing. And then the third tool, if the others don't work, is blackmail. And the Epstein saga, well, within this view, it's presented as a really clear example of that third tool, a control mechanism.

Okay. Yeah, that makes sense. And the documentary really digs into the setting for this, right? New York and New Jersey real estate. It describes it as, I think the phrase was, "a cesspool of organized crime and corrupt pay-to-play government." The argument there is that bribery and blackmail aren't unusual; it's just how state contracting works. There's even a quote from a consultant saying, "In Jersey, you give money for results, not just access."

Exactly. And the source suggests that within this environment, there's a group described as Zionist ideologues. And this group, according to the source, uses its wealth to push certain interests, influencing American money, media, and military power. The documentary basically positions this as the world Trump and also Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, learned to navigate even faster.

Okay. So, following that line of argument from the source, the marriage between Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner isn't just personal then. It's presented more like a merger, right? Uniting two big real estate power wings in that NY/NJ scene.

That's the portrayal. Jared's father, Charles Kushner, a convicted felon. The source claims his empire was built with some ruthless tactics. He was a big political donor. But the documentary alleges that when, say, bribery didn't work, he resorted to more extreme stuff. It points specifically to his conviction for setting up a honey trap, you know, luring someone into a compromising situation, recording it against his own brother-in-law because his brother-in-law was cooperating with investigators. And the film also alleges involvement in setting up Governor McGreevey similarly, which was later used for blackmail. It's presented as a very direct use of that third tool we talked about.

So, what about Trump himself in all this? The source seems pretty clear that he's shown as being part of the same world, navigating these networks to build his own empire. For Trump Tower, the documentary says he used S&A Concrete, which the source identifies as controlled by Fat Tony Salerno, a big name in the Genovese crime family, and his connection was Roy Cohn, the infamous mob lawyer. There are also details about a judge finding Trump conspired, using underpaid non-union Polish workers for demolition work while a mob-linked union looked the other way. Even his Atlantic City casinos are shown having deep ties to organized crime figures, according to the documentary.

Right? So when you look at all that historical context, these patterns presented in the source, it brings us back to the core question for you listening: Can someone apparently so deeply involved in a system like that truly be independent? The conclusion drawn by the source material is, well, for this proof of weapons network, a leader with that kind of background isn't a problem. Actually, the suggestion is he's a predictable asset because he already knows the game. He's played it. The documentary asserts the Epstein network itself was created precisely to control these kinds of powerful men. So whether Trump was a direct target or just a product of the same system that allowed Epstein to operate, the ball and chain, as the source calls it, is presented as real.

So the final thought for you to consider is this: How does understanding this idea, this proof of weapons network, and this alleged historical mix of power, money, and influence, how does that change your perception of political independence? Just a reminder, the core research we discuss comes from Ryan Dawson's documentary Trump's Zionist Ball and Chain, synthesized by Simon Dixon. As always, we encourage you to keep exploring these complex topics with a critical eye.

[End of AI Summary Video]

Okay, hope you enjoyed that summary. So, we got two more parts in this week's geopolitics. I'm going to do an analysis based upon the assumption from that documentary, and you can go find out the sources and dig for yourself to form your perspective of what it would mean if Trump is actually compromised, and if the proof of weapons network players are also simultaneously compromised, which I believe to be the case based upon what I've learned from following the money and understanding power dynamics. How would you be able to take advantage of that?

And that's what I think happened this week in geopolitics with the Epstein files. So, let's look at the proof of weapons network power dynamics. Let's dig a little bit deeper. What happened this week? Elon Musk, representing the technology industrial complex of the proof of weapons network and that faction, was completely relentless in pushing for the release of the Epstein files, as we covered in the beginning section. This is completely clashing with Trump's claim that the client list doesn't exist. So Trump looks like a complete liar, or you have to do 5G backward thinking and question your beliefs. You either believe at this stage that this is "Q, trust the plan" and you'll believe anything, or you recognize that there is a level of compromise happening here. This is really problematic because many different factions that kind of supported Trump now don't support Trump, and you're left with just the radical cultists. That's all that's kind of left, or people that just think there is some codified thing that's happening here.

I don't think that Trump is in charge of the files, put it that way. If he wanted to release them, I don't think he can release them. And I think Elon knows that these will never be released as well. So if Elon knows that they can never be released and Trump can't release them, then Elon, knowing that the people at the top of the chain of the proof of weapons network and the deep state actors can't implicate the financial industrial complex, then he also knows that they can never be used, and he can use that in order to gain some strategic power for his agenda. I think that this is all that lies in the genuine power play. What Elon Musk can do is fragment the power that Trump has for the technology industrial complex.

So even though Trump has been doing a lot for the proof of weapons network, mainly the technology and financial industrial complex, he also has a lot of power because he has this cult following and he's also a wild card. He can say things that are very unpredictable. I don't think he's scripting everything. You can tell the difference when he's reading from the script and when he's just going off in his own mode. And so you can use this in order to keep Trump in a bit of a survival mode by weakening some of his cult following.

So Elon's call to release the Epstein files, I think, is not about exposing the truth because he knows that it can't come out. He also knows that Jeffrey Epstein was targeting many of the PayPal mafia and the technology industrial complex, as covered in the documentary. It's a weapon to essentially erode Trump's MAGA base and pull some of the voters towards his own cause, knowing that Trump is compromised but it can't be released and Trump doesn't control it. So that gives him a lot of power here. He's utilizing it while he can.

Trump has basically been very loyal to the proof of weapons network, as I covered in this week in Bitcoin and this week in macro. We are full-blown into the multipolar world order that I think BlackRock has invested into, and that was covered in a previous section. Trump's struggle to hold MAGA together draws him closer to being an asset for the right faction of the proof of weapons network. This is a proof of weapons network-friendly policy implemented by Elon Musk, is how I see it when understanding the power dynamics. And really, the proof of weapons network wins with both players, because Elon's one of the players, Trump's one of the players, and they've got shareholders in both positions. Both of them are doing what they want to do. Some of them are unpredictable, some of them are less predictable. But if you take away some of the control, you can profit from some of the volatility. It's kind of a win-win game.

So, I don't think it's about paying down the national debt, and I don't think he cares about the Epstein files being released. I think it's a power play and a game where you've got Trump as the golden boy. He's pushing deregulation as the proof of weapons network wants. He's pushing the corporate tax cuts as the proof of weapons network wants. He's pushing policies that help their profits, that allow them to consolidate smaller corporations and bankruptcies into the large multinational corporations. He's implementing policies that help the multipolar world order. And he's been a very reliable proxy for the proof of weapons network in the case of vassalizing the US into this stateless control network. He's been delivering for the financial and tech sectors. But why not be able to control it further, knowing that you won't release this and weaponizing this unique opportunity around the Epstein files? This is because he's a risky bet and he's a little bit volatile, and you don't know whether he's going to be able to do that. So destabilizing his base and his supporter base keeps him compromised and keeps him faithful to the proof of weapons network while simultaneously ensuring that he's in line with the different priorities.

So I think that's what's happening here. This also aligns with some posts I shared on X from the Evanx account that I follow, which does a lot of this game theoretical work. I combine that with my understanding of the proof of weapons network as well as some of the documentaries and summaries from Ryan Dawson. This is really becoming a team effort to put this together, and then in Bitcoin Hard Talk, I can kind of get ahead of the money and share what I think is actually happening.

I think this means that we're more likely to double down on this multipolarity and the vassalization of America, and that Musk is there to basically remind Trump who's the boss. While you have power in certain plays, the proof of weapons network has power in the Epstein way. But knowing that it can't be released, how do you weaponize Elon Musk and his X control in order to strategically weaken?

So, I think that the proof of weapons network has control over the Epstein files—whether that's the Mossad faction, the CIA faction, one of these Black Operations that's a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin, or whether it's through some of these different operations that are funded by controlling the oil through the Kurd proxies within Syria. But I think somewhere in the proof of weapons network, which the deep state is subordinate to, I think that's where the Epstein files are. So I don't even think Elon or Trump can release them. I don't think they will ever be released, and I don't think it's ever going to happen because those that have the power are implicated as well. It's just a weapon based upon a scenario that can keep leaders in check and aligned to the proof of weapons network, on top of the lobby money, on top of the blackmail operations, on top of the various other networks.

And remember, most people think that when I say Mossad, that that means Israel. Israel is controlled, and Netanyahu is just middle management like Trump is, that has their own power structure. Israel is a tool for the profits of the military-industrial complex. And so when Zionism is no longer a strategic asset because you want to dump Zionism for military profits and destabilization campaigns and replace it with rebuilding and capital inflows, which I believe is the negotiated settlement that we're witnessing in the region right now, then you have to put the case forward that finance makes more money than the lost military profits, and the military gets to make that money up in Europe and Asia Pacific. So that's what I think is happening with the different power dynamics and following the money and the game theory, putting together different thoughts. So that's the Epstein files part. I hope you enjoyed that and you can start to analyze things. You can go over to my blog if you want more details and you want to see some of the source documents behind some of the things I cover here.

But the other big story and the final story for today is what happened in Syria. There are a lot of things going on that I've been prepping people for, but all eyes were on the Syrian escalation. If you remember from previous episodes of This Week in Geopolitics, I've been covering over the week that I believe the negotiations have happened, but there are different escalations based upon things not going to plan and gaining more power by taking over different territories. But eventually, all the players are moving towards this normalization of the Middle East and negotiations with the different power brokers, with the proof of weapons network, and a movement towards decolonization from the American proof of weapons network so that forever wars end and eventually we get replaced with this environment of mass growth, mass investment, and mass capital inflows. That was a result of BRICS aligning with the GCC and the ASEAN countries, and then the US having to strategically retreat because it was no longer the global hegemon. Then the GCC buying and doing deals with Trump led to the issuance of stablecoins, as discussed in part one, that then changed the macro environment through tariff policies that reset the world order, as we're discussing here. I don't want to go through all of that again; you can catch up on that in part one and part two.

I was talking about how eventually there is going to be a Netanyahu exit, and he's trying to be as useful for the military-industrial complex part of the proof of weapons network as possible. He's negotiating his strategic exit, which doesn't involve going to prison but does involve probably him disappearing and not being held accountable for his crimes. He's got leverage that he's negotiating, and that's why this has gone on longer than it should and why more people and the genocide is being worse than it should be based upon the current situation. So he's trying to show his full utility to the military-industrial complex, which will eventually be exhausted, and then we get the strategic exit: the financial industrial complex takeover, which requires a non-Zionist, non-extreme cabinet government within Israel; a movement towards a two-state or one-state solution that will eventually lead to the vassalization and weakening of Israel because funds are being pulled, but they're only being invested in distressed assets, which the GCC will buy up on the cheap as the leader in the region for that bloc, the Gulf Cooperation Council. Then obviously BlackRock and the financial industrial complex want as many deals as possible with the technology industrial complex for their companies, which is why Nvidia is building up the region with AI data centers. Then there's nuclear program negotiations, which requires Iran's cooperation, which requires a Palestinian solution so that you can harness nuclear energy and become a data center for all of this artificial intelligence. It requires the territorial disputes to all be resolved, and it's going slower than I originally thought. It's getting more aggressive, but I think we're still moving in this direction. Obviously, if the Palestinians get completely ethnically cleansed and the area gets completely taken over, and Hamas stops resisting, then this analysis would be a point at which we've gone wrong. But right now, following the money and following the power dynamics, I believe that for all the reasons I've covered in previous episodes, this is exactly what is happening right now.

The next move that I said needs to happen is a Netanyahu exit and the strategic destabilization campaign of the Israeli cabinet so that the military-industrial complex and financial industrial complex can stop propping up Israel, so it can go to the vassalization phase that I just covered.

So what happened this week? We had the International Criminal Court chief prosecutor, his name is Karim Khan, come out and say he was basically told and threatened. Remember, we had the blackmail operation where one of the judges in the court case said that Mossad agents were threatening their family and their children, and they had to come out publicly on TV to stop that from happening. But this week, Karim Khan was told to drop the arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant as well, two key players in the cabinet. And if he and the ICC were to continue, then they would be destroyed. We've had these sanctions that have been inflicted via the proof of weapons network, deep state proxies, via Trump, via the US government.

Netanyahu, on the Monday after delaying by attending the White House appointment, had to attend his local Israeli corruption court charges. So there was the first sign that he's facing those charges locally, and there was a campaign to address his international criminal court charges—his corruption charges and his war crime charges. I think he's fighting for survival and taking attention away because the more war there is, the more he gets to be useful, the more profits for the military-industrial complex, and the more negotiation power, which is the painful, disgusting process that we're going through right now. Always remember, I haven't got my humanitarian hat on right now. When I go through that, I'll tell you at the very end about the disgusting crimes against humanity that are happening. Right now, I'm on my analytical side, which isn't what I want to happen, it's just analyzing what I believe is happening.

The court case was on the same day that there was an escalation. Israel launched strikes on Damascus, Syria, the capital of Syria. A massive escalation. I genuinely think this caught most people off guard. This wasn't one of those theater, pre-warned events. I think this was out of the plan.

I just want to give you a quick recap because Syria is ultra-complicated. We've covered it multiple times in the geopolitical section, but let me just give you a bit of a summary so that you can understand more of the complexities and nuances, because Syria is one of the hardest ones to understand with its different factions. You know that the military-industrial complex and the deep state fund different groups. When you hear about ISIS, it's just a rental; it's like a militia-as-a-service. Different intelligence agencies created it through American wars, funded through USAID, and then Israel and America would use these torture camps to radicalize people and turn them into intelligence assets and have infiltration at the highest level. By destroying and sanctioning economies, you can build these little militia armies that can fight for your Western interests. And then you can pretend that it's something to do with religious radicalism, even though it doesn't identify with any of the religious beliefs. That's how these militia groups work, and many countries use them. Russia uses them through Wagner, Iran uses them through Hezbollah and various other genuine resistance groups that are also funded, and therefore, whoever funds them has to attach their agenda. So you have Qatari interests, you have Iran interests, and America through organizations like MS-13 and ISIS, al-Qaeda, and various other ones.

Let me remind you of what's happening on the Syria side, the key players. There is a militia group which is a combination of genuine Syrian rebels and a group called HTS (Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham). HTS, in simple terms, is backed by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Turkey. So that represents their interests. When I hear HTS, they'll tell you it's just this group of Syrian relation, but I hear GCC interests, Turkey's interests in the vassalization of Syria. When I hear SDF, which is the Syrian Democratic Forces, and I hear about the Syrian government and the Kurds, which is a leftist, Marxist group of people that don't have a home but are located in Turkey, in Iran, in Iraq, and in Syria, they're essentially backed by US interests, but US in terms of the financial industrial complex because they occupy the oil in Syria that funds some of the black operations for their slush funds for weapons trafficking, human trafficking, and drug trafficking—American operations, but mainly the financial industrial complex represented mainly by Trump right now. This is why Trump's talking about removing sanctions, essentially freeing oil and allowing Syria to use its wheat that's being used by American forces represented by the SDF and the Kurds.

So you got HTS (GCC and Turkey), SDF (American interests), and the Kurds (American interests). Then you have the Druze. The Druze are a different ideology and a different group, but some of them were offered Israeli citizenship and are aligned and factioned off in Israeli borders as Israeli citizens. Some of them hate Israel, others are aligned with different forces, but there is a militia side to them that represents and is aligned with Israeli interests. And so when you think of Israel, you think of a colony of America that represents the deep state US military-industrial complex as opposed to the financial interests.

So you've got Turkey/GCC, you've got the US Banking Financial Industrial Complex represented by the SDF and the Kurds, and now you've got the Druze and Israel, which is the US military-industrial complex. Then you've got a few more regional players which are part of the GCC and are aligned with various parts of BRICS, i.e., Russian and Chinese interests. One of those is UAE, which is in bed with HTS (remember GCC). Sorry for all of these acronyms, I told you it's complicated, I'm doing my best. Their interest is that they invested in an $800 million deal to develop Tartus Port. Tartus Port was originally a port that gives access to the Mediterranean Sea that was negotiated between the previous Assad regime and Russia. So Russia and UAE are kind of in a partnership through strategic investments and normalization. And now with the Assad regime overthrow, which if you've watched the previous episode, I believe Iran agreed to that, Russia agreed to that, the GCC agreed to that, US forces agreed to that, and Israel agreed to that. Therefore, it was allowed to happen the way that it happened. But I don't believe that the UAE is behind this current operation, or any of the players, in fact.

I believe right now, because we're moving to this normalization that requires the end negotiation of the Iran financial industrial complex deals and the Palestinian solution and then the vassalization of Israel all into a one-state solution over the years ahead, with the GCC being the power in the region, the UAE as part of the GCC at large, Turkey, and Iran are all on the same side when it basically comes to Syria at the moment. So this didn't make any sense. But who is negotiating additional strategic power? Israel. Israel represents the military-industrial complex, and the other groups represent the financial industrial complex for the proof of weapons network. The US isn't doing anything because they said desanction. Some of the Kurds' forces started demilitarizing, and they haven't sent ISIS in, they haven't sent an al-Qaeda proxy in through a disruption campaign via Israel or the military-industrial complex. So I don't think that this was planned.

So what is this then? The speculation based upon following the money is that the Druze were essentially in the region that has now been conquered, which is As-Suwayda. As-Suwayda is a region within Syria, and it basically caused a bit of a chain reaction because I believe that there was resistance from the Druze that are meant to be aligned with HTS, which is GCC and Turkey interests. So Turkey and the GCC, they need to push back harder via HTS. They need to push harder on Syria because essentially they looked weakened, and I don't think this was planned because Israel then came in and saw the opportune moment and said, "All right, here's an opportunity. We'll pretend that we're defending the Druze, and we get an additional chance to weaken HTS by essentially hitting some of their military defenses and consolidate and secure our own interests in these negotiations between financial and military in the end normalization phase." It essentially used this opportunity to, immediately as violence broke out, which I think was genuinely between HTS and the Druze—I think the Druze just started to work on their own autonomy and their own interests—Israel decided to weaken HTS and basically keep Syria as fragmented as possible so that it can have additional power, additional territory in the eventual negotiations.

Just so you know, Israel does not give a damn about the Druze. That's the narrative. That's how they always spin it. That's how it will always be told to you. But the proof of weapons network and the proof of weapons-backed SDF from the financial complex, they have created a bit of a mess here, and it's led to escalation for no point of escalation, and it's a bit unsure about what's actually going to happen next. Now, I do think it moves towards normalization. But Syria essentially is weak, and the SDF is deciding if they are going to hold their ground. But Israel took over some of the territory, and I think that was to negotiate better terms, which also gives Netanyahu strategic leverage and a distraction campaign as part of his exit negotiations, which coincided exactly with some of the civil unrest campaigns that we're seeing within Israel. We'll cover what happened this week as the final part.

Essentially, the SDF, representing the US financial industrial complex, their real leverage is control of the oil fields and the wheat fields, and the fact that they're also backed by the US military-industrial complex that profits from this. At the moment, the SDF seems to be prioritizing autonomy over normalization, which I think is leading to this uprising, and the regional players need to renegotiate and use some more aggression. This is not a good sign because Syria is not looking good. I was on Spaces, and we were covering all this in real time. There were rumors that Julani, the leader, was taken back to Turkey. I'm not sure if that is the case, but it's not looking good. That's the current situation that's happening in Syria.

There was an eruption. The Druze resistance inspired the SDF to jump in. Now the different power factions are not aligned. HTS is fighting the Druze, the Kurds, and then there are all the other different types of groups because Syria is the most complicated. I just gave you the main groups. So I think the GCC needs to step in. Israel seems to be showing more strength and dominance here. So the different negotiations and the proof of weapons network that essentially sees the chaos in Syria, this could derail everything. These operations are fluid, and this is a risky part of the operation. I think essentially the proof of weapons network is kind of hedging both sides. It's got Israel's military-industrial complex, it's got the SDF's financial industrial complex, and it's got the occupation through the Kurds of the different resources. It can either go through a massive fragmentation and destabilization campaign, or it can negotiate with HTS, Turkey, and the GCC to try and get more power.

What else have I got for you? So Israel basically jumped in. They started bombing and they got more territory. They're starting to push the narrative of protecting borders. They do get to protect the borders, but hopefully this doesn't go into chaos and the leaders in the industry can get hold of their militias and factions and take control of it. But at the end of the day, there are a lot more greater profits in reconstruction and in oil deals. I believe that forever war is not the model. This is what I think all the players in the region need to get to. I don't think any of this has got to do with Iran-backed militias. I think Iran has sat back and they're just engaged in the separate negotiation with the US and what they're going to be doing there.

Basically, as it stands right now, I think the Druze, the ex-Assadist loyalists, the different factions, and Israel are all on the same page at the moment. But Israel's got a little bit more strategic power, representing more military profits and more death and destruction, which is the way that this satanic, demonic network works. They get to play both sides while allowing the regional players to figure out the stability and see which one ends up on top. I'm not sure exactly what's going to happen next, but we'll keep covering that one. All eyes are on Syria and what comes next. I think if we don't have massive changes next week, I'm going to be covering more on the Russia, Ukraine, and China situation as we try and keep up with all these different proof of weapons network plays.

Let's go into the final parts of what happened within Israel and whether we're moving on that target. At the same time as this escalation, which I think Israel seized upon even though I don't think it was planned (maybe it was), the cabinet in Israel is being weakened. The reason that was happening is we started to see that within Israel, it's a coalition cabinet and it relies upon different factions all remaining intact. Two of the major ones that represent Orthodox Jewish people, who essentially practice their Judaism and don't engage in joining the IDF or military operations, were basically told that they need to join the army through forced conscription. In resistance and protest against that, two of the parties have basically said that they're going to leave Netanyahu's Likud party. The Likud party was connected to all the terrorist regimes and his father that created Israel in the first place, that basically created the terrorism industry. But if these two leave, this is the fall of the cabinet. So, I think this is part of the cabinet fall regime change that I've been predicting will be coming next. Even if one more falls, that basically takes out the coalition, and the coalition collapsing means the majority would no longer stand, and it would require instant new elections, I think is the outcome.

So Netanyahu needed a distraction, which kind of lines up with the Syria campaign and the Druze escalating. One could argue that that's part of what this operation may be. But Netanyahu right now, in order to survive, he needs to show strength for the extremist Zionists that are engaging in all the settler colonialism and terrorizing the Palestinians right now and conquering more land within the West Bank. He needs to support that, and that's why we're getting these massively disgusting expansions that are happening there. But at the same time, we're getting the Western exposure campaigns where more and more people are finding out about this.

I do believe that this is part of the Israeli strategic weakening into a pariah state, a bit like North Korea or what they tried to do with Iran. I do think that there is more and more condemnation around the world. There were meetings where 16 leaders met up to say how they can form strategic embargos to make sure weapons don't get from America, by controlling shipping routes. More and more of that is happening. So it's being strategically weakened into a pariah state.

At the same time, the Syrian president, as a result of this operation, who was aligned with normalizing with Israel, basically came out and said that Israel is seeking endless chaos in the region. He blamed it on Israel, which most people thought he was a proxy for Israel, but I think he is a proxy for Turkey and the GCC. He said that over 1,000 confirmed young victims is a shockingly large and tragic number. That's the people that died in this operation as a result of Israel expanding their territory by taking advantage of this.

Basically, Israel is now coming out and saying that they're looking to repatriate the Druze and expand their borders. Now Syrian forces are deciding whether they're going to withdraw. Some of the strategic territory was now occupied in a ceasefire agreement, and now there's resistance against that ceasefire. There was a joint statement by Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the UAE, Bahrain, Turkey, Iraq, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, Lebanon, and Egypt. The quote basically says it "affirms the unwavering support for Syria's security, unity, stability, and sovereignty," and they were all condemning and rejecting Israeli repeated attacks on Syria and Damascus. The United Nations came out, America came out, Marco Rubio came out. So all around the world, there was universal condemnation for what Israel did.

Israel also, at the same time as this, started killing and attacking Christian churches within Palestine. The Christian community was being bombed, which led to deaths, injuries for priests and pastors, and the destruction of the oldest churches in the region—where Jesus Christ, if you're a Christian, or Prophet Isa, if you're a Muslim—these are the oldest territories in terms of theological scriptures. The Pope himself had to come out and do a call with Netanyahu, warning him that Christians shouldn't be targeted. This has happened before, but now the media started covering it when before it wouldn't have. Trump basically came out, and there was a public statement that he's upset when he heard about the Israel attack on Gaza, referring to the Christian attack, even though in Israel, this has happened, and they systemically spit on Christians in certain regions. He warned to get Netanyahu on the phone right away. Whether that's theatrics, we don't know, but that was a report from Axios, and Axios is kind of Mossad/CIA/deep state-controlled media as well. So more military-industrial complex-aligned narratives, but you get to see what types of narratives they're putting in, which is consistent with this being part of the negotiated exit and the destabilization campaign within Israel.

Immediately after the Syrian attack, a US State Department spokesperson, I believe Marco Rubio, came out and said that the US does not support Israeli strikes on Syria. I genuinely believe that the US immediately sought to stop this as well. There was a lot more anti-Zionist messaging happening on mainstream American and Western media with podcasters like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Joe Rogan. I think this is consistent with the next phase of the operation, but I think the Syria side pushed it back a bit.

And remember, now I'm going to put my humanitarian eyes on Gaza. While we put all eyes on Syria, I just want to end with a little bit of a humanitarian focus on Gaza, because the genocide in Gaza is getting worse and worse and worse. The starvation campaign, the famine campaign. I want to remind everybody that Wikileaks said that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is US-backed and executed via Israel because they wiped out UNRWA, which was the organization that was able to distribute food. They did that through their atrocity propaganda, actually done by one of the co-founders of Celsius's wife, Daniel Leon's partner, who works for propaganda and released different articles connecting UNRWA to October 7th after leaving the Celsius Ponzi scheme scam, using atrocity propaganda. Make sure you watch the blog with the AI summary of atrocity propaganda to help you understand what October 7th is. I covered that one last week.

But now, the US is basically opening just one concentration camp this Friday for Palestinians receiving their food. If you watch any of the footage that's coming out, it is crimes against humanity. It's a complete exhaustion campaign—how I feel at the end of Bitcoin Hard Talk, but to a tiny, tiny degree. These are people that are starving, that have been in over 630 days of this, that are completely exhausted, that have been fed lies after lies after lies, that are now going through a deliberate famine campaign by targeting and wiping out 70% of all the infrastructure, taking out the working hospitals, deliberately not allowing gas or oil to get to the hospitals that are needed, making the hospitals completely unusable, with no ability to cope, constricting aid, constricting water, constricting everything that's needed, limiting it down to the bare minimum for survival.

And now Palestinians are going through brain damage as a result of this, because of the fact that they're going through severe malnutrition. They're going through a severe starvation campaign. We've had deaths as a result of that. And now on the economic side, Israel sent in their ISIS proxies to, whenever the aid got in, take away the aid, creating hyperinflation. There are gangsters in the group that are now taking the aid, selling it on for profit, and the Palestinians that have any money left are having to go and beg for external funding. They're cutting off the financial rails. We covered this before. All the Binance accounts were closed, centralized accounts. They wiped out the banks and financial institutions. They're censoring any PayPal campaigns and various other things by using the proof of weapons network. They're making sure even in a hyperinflationary environment that they can't get the money that they need. It's absolute crimes against humanity.

This is what backs the dollar. This is the full force of the proof of weapons network. This is the exact cyber campaign of how this works. And they'll give you all the lies and pretend that it's not actually happening. But remember, this is fully American-funded, fully backed up by the Israeli terrorists that are inflicting the actual violence. The IDF actually admitted that they were given instructions to snipe. I put some footage out there of the sniper campaigns. The people that come to these essential concentration camps to try and get some aid either come back completely empty-handed and exhausted, or if they're one of the people that was massacred, they're killed, or they come back completely wounded. That's the reality of this.

That's the deeper meaning behind why I try and expose the flow of money and try and help you understand the importance of boycotting this system. The way that I know how to do it is to boycott the Federal Reserve, which is the source of propping up the dollar by this violence. You can do that by owning Bitcoin outside the Federal Reserve system. Boycott BlackRock and the key players of the financial factions of the military-industrial complex by holding your Bitcoin in self-custody rather than holding it with them, giving them more economic power by charging you fees. Boycott the banks by continually owning more Bitcoin each month and playing that four-year cycle, so that by the end of the four-year cycle, you never look back. I can't promise you future returns, but previously that's meant you grow more economic wealth so that you don't need to borrow and you can end up buying houses rather than taking out mortgages, because the cost of a house when priced in Bitcoin always goes down. The price of a house when priced in fiat currency always goes up.

And then when you've got economic power, you might want to use lobbying to create a next generation of politicians that fight against that power. Or maybe you want to use it to engage in strategic boycotting. Use your money for good. Become more conscious around what you're doing with your money. Spend local. Spend on your local farmers. It's good for you, it's good for your health, it's good for everything. Be able to grow more economic power so you can control the flows of money. If we all do that and we all get more people to understand what they don't want you to understand, which is why I rely upon you to share this content because I'm heavily shadowbanned. We got past 100,000 subscribers. Thank you to everybody that got us here. We need to get to 210,000 subscribers as the next milestone. So, if you've enjoyed this content, subscribe, hit the bell symbol, hit all. YouTube will message you every time I go live. Follow me over on X, and I'll make sure that you can interact with me in real time if you send me a message; it will come up on some of those spaces. I've got a backup of all the live streams over there in case we get taken down from those networks. We're doing live streams over on Rumble, follow me over there. And if you're into podcasts, you can subscribe and follow my channel Bitcoin Hard Talk on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Finally, in case we get completely censored and they don't want this message to go out on all platforms and I get canceled, then join my mailing list on simonixon.com. In exchange, I'll give you access to a newsletter and all the free resources you need to manage your transition in a world of Bitcoin, AI, and central bank digital currencies.

So, always remember, you are alive at one of the most interesting and exciting times in financial history. Those on the wrong side of the proof of weapons network are having crimes against humanity committed on them. Those on the right side need to build the economic power in order to be able to change the system. And I think we can do it with as much peace, love, and unity as we can by exiting the system. I'd like you to be on the right side of that change.

This was everything I'm going to be covering in Bitcoin Hard Talk episode 90. In part one, we covered the different acts that are being implemented, the Bitcoin strategic reserve, and everything that happened this week in Bitcoin. In part two, we covered the EU destabilization campaign, the Japan debt-based Ponzi scheme, and what it means for China, BRICS, the different regional players, and the US vassalization and artificial intelligence transitions and everything that happened this week in macro, tariffs, and everything else. In part three, we covered deconstructing the Epstein files, understanding whether Trump is compromised and how Elon Musk is utilizing that and some of the power dynamics, and how that led to the events that happened in Israel, the Middle East, and Syria, and some of the power dynamics that are happening in Syria as, after entering into a time of relative peace with atrocities happening, it's being destabilized again. Hopefully, it gets back on track because eventually, there needs to be negotiation. There needs to be normalization, and I think that's the direction that we're heading to over the months and years ahead.

So I will continue, and I will see you this time next week for Bitcoin Hard Talk episode 91. Leave a comment below and let me know what you think. I read all those comments, and I'll answer you. Peace.