Self Custody is the way
Core Argument
Simon Dixon presents a conspiracy narrative claiming that Jeffrey Epstein, working with Peter Thiel from 2011 onwards, orchestrated a sustained campaign to infiltrate and co-opt Bitcoin—moving it away from decentralised self-custody toward centralised, Wall Street-controlled alternatives.

Significant Allegations of Wrong-Doing
| Alleged Actor | Alleged Wrong-Doing |
|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein & Peter Thiel | Attempted to infiltrate Bitcoin developer networks to "pull Bitcoin back into the fold" of centralised control |
| Brock Pierce | Described as "Epstein's guy in the digital currency space"; allegedly tried to persuade Dixon that Craig Wright was Satoshi Nakamoto; co-founded Tether (later sold to Bitfinex) |
| Dr. Craig Wright | Accused of falsely claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto; Dixon notes he "recently got a year in prison... for pretending to be Satoshi" |
| Gavin Andresen | Allegedly lied when claiming Craig Wright had "cryptographically proven" he was Satoshi; Dixon states "that was a lie. He hadn't" |
| Michael Saylor | Accused of participating in efforts to get people to own Bitcoin through treasury companies rather than self-custody |
| BlackRock | Accused of pushing Bitcoin ETFs to remove self-custody |
| Cantor Fitzgerald & Howard Lutnick | Accused of offering Bitcoin-backed lending to circumvent self-custody; Lutnick explicitly linked to "the Epstein network" |
| David Sacks | Accused of introducing policies (GENIUS Act, etc.) that turned stablecoins into "programmable police and surveillance grids" |
Significant Claims
- Iran as largest sovereign Bitcoin miner: Dixon claims Iran is "the largest sovereign Bitcoin miner in the world powered by nuclear energy"—and asserts this was always the true purpose of Iran's nuclear programme ("It was never a nuclear weapon. It was always nuclear energy").
- Tether as "gateway drug" for CBDCs: Dixon argues Tether was deliberately positioned to pave the way for central bank digital currencies.
- Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV as infiltration tools: Claims these forks were created to "confuse the community into going to a more centralised version of Bitcoin."
- "Operation 2.0" and other unnamed operations: References multiple covert operations to divert Bitcoin users toward "the stablecoin alternative crypto gambling world."
Key Lists & Terminology Retained
- Legislation cited: Bank Secrecy Act, GENIUS Act, Patriot Act, Clarity Act
- Forks mentioned: Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV)
- Financial instruments: ETFs, stablecoins, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)
- Network statistics: 25,000 Bitcoin nodes
Dixon's Prescribed Alternative
Dixon advocates for self-custody Bitcoin—direct ownership via the distributed network of 25,000 nodes—rejecting all intermediaries including:
- Treasury companies (Michael Saylor's model)
- ETFs (BlackRock)
- Bitcoin-backed lending (Cantor Fitzgerald)
- Stablecoins
- Central bank digital currencies
- "Crypto" generally (distinguished from Bitcoin)