The year everything changed

Jason (Archaix) presents a broad, intricate thesis arguing that a global reordering of the heavens and human chronology occurred in 713 BC. He ties together Bible passages, Mesopotamian and Egyptian inscriptions, Mayan calendrics, archaeological calendar reforms (Rome, Persia, India, Egypt), and non‑mainstream physical claims (magnetic/polar shifts, plasma phenomena) to argue that the ancient world shifted from a 360‑day, moon‑based temporal order to a 365+‑day solar regime. That shift, he says, produced the modern precessional wobble and set in motion cycles that culminate in a “tertiary field” event beginning around 2046 AD (often associated by him with Nemesis/Nibiru / “Nemesis X”), which he interprets as a portal/reordering event rather than straightforward apocalypse.

Click to watch the full monologue and explanation

Core thesis (short)

Prior to the 8th century BC most cultures used a 360‑day year (12×30) and tracked time by the moon; the year change to ~365.25 days was imposed globally after a synchronous astronomical disturbance around 713 BC.
That disturbance involved the sun “retrograding” ~10°, the moon disappearing/being obstructed for months in some records, and a catastrophic atmospheric/electrical event that killed vast numbers of soldiers at the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem (the 185,000 in Isaiah/2 Kings).
The emergence of precession as a detectable phenomenon, the development of solar zodiacs, the addition of five intercalary days to calendars worldwide, and the reconfiguration of pole stars are all consequences of the same event.
The Mayan Long Count, reinterpreted as a pure day‑count using 360‑day ancients years, points to a later terminal date of 2046 (not 2012). That date coincides with independent signals Jason sees in pyramid geometry and other cyclical records, and marks the start of a tertiary/portal field tied to Nemesis X / Nibiru that will change experiential reality for different people depending on resonance.

Key evidence and arguments Jason emphasizes

Biblical and Assyrian synchrony: He cites Hezekiah’s “shadow reversed 10°” (2 Chronicles, Isaiah) and Assyrian annals describing the failed siege and subsequent assassination of King Sennacherib (Sinsharishkun), reading these as an astronomical/atmospheric episode (possible plasma/flux tube discharge) that coincides with a chronological breakpoint.
Multiple calendar reforms in the 700s BC: He points to Roman calendar confusion around Romulus/Numa, Egyptian calendar reform (Canopus Decree references an “amendment of the faults of heaven”), Babylonian disruptions (20 years without the New Year festival), Persian and Indian additions of intercalary days, and Mesoamerican/Andean records naming five “unlucky/useless” days — all argued to be consistent with a single global event.
Precession and zodiac chronology: He stresses academic scholarship that places the development of a solar zodiac and awareness of precession centuries after 713 BC (citing scholars who date the solar zodiac development to roughly 550 BC–150 AD). Jason reads that precession was not a long‑standing ancient observation but a later effect produced by the changed Sun–Moon–Earth dynamics.
Velikovsky and magnetic reversal claims: He leans heavily on Velikovsky’s work and on a mid‑20th century report (which he says has been scrubbed online) that claims a geomagnetic polarity change in the 8th century BC, arguing this supports a real physical reordering rather than mere calendrical convention.
Recalculation of the Mayan Long Count: Jason argues the Long Count’s 1,872,000 days should be interpreted against an original 360‑day year base, producing a terminal alignment at 2046 AD. He also highlights internal Mayan language and stone inscriptions to claim the 713 BC point appears as an important midpoint (sixth baktun).
Pyramid encoding: He references early 20th‑century analyses (e.g., Davidson 1924) that allegedly encode a timeline culminating around 2045/46 in the Great Pyramid’s geometry, and links this independently to his Nemesis/Nibiru chronology.
Phenomenological model: He introduces a layered field model (Phoenix cycles, tertiary/quaternary fields) where returns of an extra‑solar or dark companion (Nemesis X, Nibiru) produce portal‑like environments. People’s experiences in such fields depend on their inner “resonance” and cultural programming.

Surprising or notable specifics he highlights

A repeatedly emphasized single pivot year: 713 BC as the global hinge — not a local curiosity but the moment “everything changed.”
The claim that the moon “disappeared” from the sky as recorded on an Assyrian tablet and that Babylonian New Year rites were suspended for ~20 years.
That the Mayan Long Count more properly ends in 2046 when counted as days, not in 2012 as most modern interpreters concluded using 365.25 in their division.
Assertion that scientific literature exposing an 8th‑century magnetic reversal has been deliberately removed from public access (404s), implying suppression to protect radiocarbon/chronology dogma.
Reinterpretation of Revelation, Sibylline, Norse Ragnarok and other prophecy sources as parallel data streams pointing to the same mid‑21st‑century window (2040–2046).

Contentious points and methodological caveats

Heavy reliance on Velikovsky and on readings of myth/prophecy as correlated scientific records. Velikovsky’s catastrophism is famously rejected by mainstream geology, astronomy, and archaeology; using his claims and asserting suppression invites skepticism.
The 185,000 vaporized Assyrian soldiers and the “retrograde sun” narrative are scriptural and annalistic; historicity and physical interpretation (plasma event, localized solar phenomena) are highly disputed and not accepted as literal astronomical records by most historians.
The claim that precession was unknown globally before ~713 BC is contested; while Jason cites academic work that dates solar zodiac development relatively late, many archaeoastronomical interpretations remain debated.
The Mayan recalculation (360 vs 365.25 conversion) is mathematically straightforward but differs from mainstream Mayanists’ consensus about the Long Count’s purpose and correlation constants; reinterpretation is consequential and controversial.
The magnetic reversal/magnetic polarity claim and alleged internet scrub are extraordinary claims that would require extraordinary corroboration in peer‑reviewed geophysics literature.
Assertions about the Great Pyramid being “Nemesis tech,” Earth as a simulacrum, planets/planes and the sun being a local phenomenon go well beyond standard science and enter metaphysical/alternative cosmology territory.

Method and sources (brief)

Jason synthesizes: biblical texts (Isaiah, Kings, Chronicles), Assyrian and Babylonian annals/tablets, Egyptian decrees and priestly records (Canopus), Mayan stone texts and Long Count arithmetic, classical historians (Herodotus), 19th/20th‑century chronologists (Usher, Donnelly), Velikovsky, and selected pyramid geometrical studies (Davidson). He displaces mainstream archaeologists/archaeoastronomers (and critics like Graham Hancock) as gatekeepers or selective inferences, accusing them of ignoring Velikovsky or misdating monuments by assuming unbroken precession.

Bottom line / what to watch

Jason’s narrative is sweeping: he connects disparate traditions into a single cataclysmic/transformative event centered on 713 BC and projects tangible consequences in 2046 (and a 14,400‑day tertiary period thereafter). The most significant and controversial claims to evaluate further are (1) the reading of the 713 BC cluster of records as evidence for a physical planetary/geomagnetic/pole‑shift event; (2) the Mayan Long Count re‑anchoring to 2046 using a 360‑day base; and (3) the supposed suppression of evidence for an 8th‑century polarity reversal. Those claims require rigorous independent corroboration in peer‑reviewed archaeology, geophysics, epigraphy and archaeoastronomy before they can be accepted by mainstream scholarship.